-- In this work, we explore the application of barrier states (BaS) in the realm of safe nonlinear adaptive control. Our proposed framework derives barrier states for systems with parametric uncertainty, which are augmented into the uncertain dynamical model. We employ an adaptive nonlinear control strategy based on a control Lyapunov functions approach to design a stabilizing controller for the augmented system. The developed theory shows that the controller ensures safe control actions for the original system while meeting specified performance objectives. We validate the effectiveness of our approach through simulations on diverse systems, including a planar quadrotor subject to unknown drag forces and an adaptive cruise control system, for which we provide comparisons with existing methodologies. Safe control methods have increasingly gained attention in recent research due to their importance in ensuring system reliability. Many of these methods rely on the notion of set invariance and detailed system models to maintain safety.

Designing controllers that are both safe and performant is inherently challenging. This co-optimization can be formulated as a constrained optimal control problem, where the cost function represents the performance criterion and safety is specified as a constraint. While sampling-based methods, such as Model Predictive Path Integral (MPPI) control, have shown great promise in tackling complex optimal control problems, they often struggle to enforce safety constraints. To address this limitation, we propose DualGuard-MPPI, a novel framework for solving safety-constrained optimal control problems. Our approach integrates Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis within the MPPI sampling process to ensure that all generated samples are provably safe for the system. On the one hand, this integration allows DualGuard-MPPI to enforce strict safety constraints; at the same time, it facilitates a more effective exploration of the environment with the same number of samples, reducing the effective sampling variance and leading to better performance optimization. Through several simulations and hardware experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves much higher performance compared to existing MPPI methods, without compromising safety.

This work introduces safety challenges for an agent's ability to learn and act in desired ways in relation to biologically and economically relevant aspects. In total we implemented nine benchmarks, which are conceptually split into three developmental stages: "basic biologically inspired dynamics in objectives", "multi-objective agents", and "cooperation". The first two stages can be considered as proto-cooperative stages, since the behavioral dynamics tested in these benchmarks will be later potentially very relevant for supporting and enabling cooperative behavior in multi-agent scenarios. The benchmarks were implemented in a gridworld-based environment. The environments are relatively simple, just as much complexity is added as is necessary to illustrate the relevant safety and performance aspects.

When tuning software configuration for better performance (e.g., latency or throughput), an important issue that many optimizers face is the presence of local optimum traps, compounded by a highly rugged configuration landscape and expensive measurements. To mitigate these issues, a recent effort has shifted to focus on the level of optimization model (called meta multi-objectivization or MMO) instead of designing better optimizers as in traditional methods. This is done by using an auxiliary performance objective, together with the target performance objective, to help the search jump out of local optima. While effective, MMO needs a fixed weight to balance the two objectives-a parameter that has been found to be crucial as there is a large deviation of the performance between the best and the other settings. However, given the variety of configurable software systems, the "sweet spot" of the weight can vary dramatically in different cases and it is not possible to find the right setting without time-consuming trial and error. In this paper, we seek to overcome this significant shortcoming of MMO by proposing a weight adaptation method, dubbed AdMMO. Our key idea is to adaptively adjust the weight at the right time during tuning, such that a good proportion of the nondominated configurations can be maintained. Moreover, we design a partial duplicate retention mechanism to handle the issue of too many duplicate configurations without losing the rich information provided by the "good" duplicates. Experiments on several real-world systems, objectives, and budgets show that, for 71% of the cases, AdMMO is considerably superior to MMO and a wide range of state-of-the-art optimizers while achieving generally better efficiency with the best speedup between 2.2x and 20x.

Robotic systems are typically composed of various subsystems, such as localization and navigation, each encompassing numerous configurable components (e.g., selecting different planning algorithms). Once an algorithm has been selected for a component, its associated configuration options must be set to the appropriate values. Configuration options across the system stack interact non-trivially. Finding optimal configurations for highly configurable robots to achieve desired performance poses a significant challenge due to the interactions between configuration options across software and hardware that result in an exponentially large and complex configuration space. These challenges are further compounded by the need for transferability between different environments and robotic platforms. Data efficient optimization algorithms (e.g., Bayesian optimization) have been increasingly employed to automate the tuning of configurable parameters in cyber-physical systems. However, such optimization algorithms converge at later stages, often after exhausting the allocated budget (e.g., optimization steps, allotted time) and lacking transferability. This paper proposes CURE -- a method that identifies causally relevant configuration options, enabling the optimization process to operate in a reduced search space, thereby enabling faster optimization of robot performance. CURE abstracts the causal relationships between various configuration options and robot performance objectives by learning a causal model in the source (a low-cost environment such as the Gazebo simulator) and applying the learned knowledge to perform optimization in the target (e.g., Turtlebot 3 physical robot). We demonstrate the effectiveness and transferability of CURE by conducting experiments that involve varying degrees of deployment changes in both physical robots and simulation.

We present a framework for achieving end-to-end management objectives for multiple services that concurrently execute on a service mesh. We apply reinforcement learning (RL) techniques to train an agent that periodically performs control actions to reallocate resources. We develop and evaluate the framework using a laboratory testbed where we run information and computing services on a service mesh, supported by the Istio and Kubernetes platforms. We investigate different management objectives that include end-to-end delay bounds on service requests, throughput objectives, cost-related objectives, and service differentiation. We compute the control policies on a simulator rather than on the testbed, which speeds up the training time by orders of magnitude for the scenarios we study. Our proposed framework is novel in that it advocates a top-down approach whereby the management objectives are defined first and then mapped onto the available control actions. It allows us to execute several types of control actions simultaneously. By first learning the system model and the operating region from testbed traces, we can train the agent for different management objectives in parallel.

Robotic systems have subsystems with a combinatorially large configuration space and hundreds or thousands of possible software and hardware configuration options interacting non-trivially. The configurable parameters are set to target specific objectives, but they can cause functional faults when incorrectly configured. Finding the root cause of such faults is challenging due to the exponentially large configuration space and the dependencies between the robot's configuration settings and performance. This paper proposes CaRE -- a method for diagnosing the root cause of functional faults through the lens of causality. CaRE abstracts the causal relationships between various configuration options and the robot's performance objectives by learning a causal structure and estimating the causal effects of options on robot performance indicators. We demonstrate CaRE's efficacy by finding the root cause of the observed functional faults and validating the diagnosed root cause by conducting experiments in both physical robots (Husky and Turtlebot 3) and in simulation (Gazebo). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the causal models learned from robots in simulation (e.g., Husky in Gazebo) are transferable to physical robots across different platforms (e.g., Husky and Turtlebot 3).

This work presents a novel loss function for learning nonlinear Model Predictive Control policies via Imitation Learning. Standard approaches to Imitation Learning neglect information about the expert and generally adopt a loss function based on the distance between expert and learned controls. In this work, we present a loss based on the Q-function directly embedding the performance objectives and constraint satisfaction of the associated Optimal Control Problem (OCP). However, training a Neural Network with the Q-loss requires solving the associated OCP for each new sample. To alleviate the computational burden, we derive a second Q-loss based on the Gauss-Newton approximation of the OCP resulting in a faster training time. We validate our losses against Behavioral Cloning, the standard approach to Imitation Learning, on the control of a nonlinear system with constraints. The final results show that the Q-function-based losses significantly reduce the amount of constraint violations while achieving comparable or better closed-loop costs.

Configurable software systems can be tuned for better performance. Leveraging on some Pareto optimizers, recent work has shifted from tuning for a single, time-related performance objective to two intrinsically different objectives that assess distinct performance aspects of the system, each with varying aspirations. Before we design better optimizers, a crucial engineering decision to make therein is how to handle the performance requirements with clear aspirations in the tuning process. For this, the community takes two alternative optimization models: either quantifying and incorporating the aspirations into the search objectives that guide the tuning, or not considering the aspirations during the search but purely using them in the later decision-making process only. However, despite being a crucial decision that determines how an optimizer can be designed and tailored, there is a rather limited understanding of which optimization model should be chosen under what particular circumstance, and why. In this paper, we seek to close this gap. Firstly, we do that through a review of over 426 papers in the literature and 14 real-world requirements datasets. Drawing on these, we then conduct a comprehensive empirical study that covers 15 combinations of the state-of-the-art performance requirement patterns, four types of aspiration space, three Pareto optimizers, and eight real-world systems/environments, leading to 1,296 cases of investigation. We found that (1) the realism of aspirations is the key factor that determines whether they should be used to guide the tuning; (2) the given patterns and the position of the realistic aspirations in the objective landscape are less important for the choice, but they do matter to the extents of improvement; (3) the available tuning budget can also influence the choice for unrealistic aspirations but it is insignificant under realistic ones.

We introduce DRAGON, an open-source, fast and explainable hardware simulation and optimization toolchain that enables hardware architects to simulate hardware designs, and to optimize hardware designs to efficiently execute workloads. The DRAGON toolchain provides the following tools: Hardware Model Generator (DGen), Hardware Simulator (DSim) and Hardware Optimizer (DOpt). DSim provides the simulation of running algorithms (represented as data-flow graphs) on hardware described. DGen describes the hardware in detail, with user input architectures/technology (represented in a custom description language). A novel methodology of gradient descent from the simulation allows us optimize the hardware model (giving the directions for improvements in technology parameters and design parameters), provided by Dopt. DRAGON framework (DSim) is much faster than previously avaible works for simulation, which is possible through performance-first code writing practices, mathematical formulas for common computing operations to avoid cycle-accurate simulation steps, efficient algorithms for mapping, and data-structure representations for hardware state. DRAGON framework (Dopt) generates performance optimized architectures for both AI and Non-AI Workloads, and provides technology improvement directions for 100x-1000x better future computing systems.